> although i'm not sure why you refer to them as 'poor-mans copyright' just a misunderstanding, I was searching my brain for the phrases you mention and out po

> although i'm not sure why you refer to them as 'poor-mans copyright' just a misunderstanding, I was searching my brain for the phrases you mention and out popped 'poor mans copyright'[1]. You are indeed correct this is a totally different thing and "Mountweasels" (fictitious artifacts) are a very sound method of establishing the originality of certain work... I have to wonder if "Mountweasels" hasn't krept into our language in just such a manner though! [1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_man%27s_copyright http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_man%27s_copyright]