4 ms·

This is factually incorrect. Blockade is not a synonym of embargo. Blockade is generally an act of war, and embargo is not. Dealing with Cuba is certainly a hug

This is factually incorrect. Blockade is not a synonym of embargo. Blockade is generally an act of war, and embargo is not. Dealing with Cuba is certainly a huge PITA for the majority of trading actors because of potential blacklisting in the US, but waters around Cuba are as open as they can be, and you can check marine traffic to make sure that ships arrive to Cuban ports. Even from the US itself (cause there are exceptions from embargo such as food, and medicines).

I-M-S 5mo ago
Our Blessed Homeland :: Their Barbarous Wastes Our Glorious Leader :: Their Wicked Despot Our Great Religion :: Their Primitive Superstition Our Noble Populace :: Their Backward Savages Our Heroic Adventurers :: Their Brutish Invaders Our Legal Embargo :: Their Illegal Blockade
- broken-kebab 5mo ago
  True, true! Also Our Noble Boycott and Divestment :: Their Savage Blockade
selfhoster1312 5mo ago
Sorry, english is not my first language. I did not realize there was a strong difference between blockade and embargo. Thanks for the correction. Though to be fair, there is currently an actual oil blockade run by the USA. And the previous embargo imposed sanctions on international entities dealing with Cuba, so it was not exactly 100% open even though technically you could sail there.
- broken-kebab 5mo ago
  I really appreciate politeness of the answer! E.g. about 2 weeks ago Russian tanker arrived to port Matanzas, Cuba (again this is searchable data). It didn't fight it's way though American cordons, it just arrived. Embargo can hit a trader's wallet hard, but it's still not a blockade.
  - selfhoster1312 5mo ago
    And i appreciate the politeness of your corrections! I'm not aware of the details, but i was under the impression that an actual blockade is going on? That's at least what many media are claiming, as summarized in this wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Cuban_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Cuban_crisis Do you have any resources explaining how that russian tanker would not be an isolated case but a symptom of widespread incorrect reporting on the issue? Or is the truth somewhere in the middle, that the USA would let through a tanker or two just to keep the pressure high but not explosive?
deleted 5mo ago
[deleted]

I-M-S 5mo ago

Our Blessed Homeland :: Their Barbarous Wastes Our Glorious Leader :: Their Wicked Despot Our Great Religion :: Their Primitive Superstition Our Noble Populace :: Their Backward Savages Our Heroic Adventurers :: Their Brutish Invaders Our Legal Embargo :: Their Illegal Blockade

broken-kebab 5mo ago
True, true! Also Our Noble Boycott and Divestment :: Their Savage Blockade

selfhoster1312 5mo ago

Sorry, english is not my first language. I did not realize there was a strong difference between blockade and embargo. Thanks for the correction. Though to be fair, there is currently an actual oil blockade run by the USA. And the previous embargo imposed sanctions on international entities dealing with Cuba, so it was not exactly 100% open even though technically you could sail there.

broken-kebab 5mo ago
I really appreciate politeness of the answer! E.g. about 2 weeks ago Russian tanker arrived to port Matanzas, Cuba (again this is searchable data). It didn't fight it's way though American cordons, it just arrived. Embargo can hit a trader's wallet hard, but it's still not a blockade.
- selfhoster1312 5mo ago
  And i appreciate the politeness of your corrections! I'm not aware of the details, but i was under the impression that an actual blockade is going on? That's at least what many media are claiming, as summarized in this wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Cuban_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Cuban_crisis Do you have any resources explaining how that russian tanker would not be an isolated case but a symptom of widespread incorrect reporting on the issue? Or is the truth somewhere in the middle, that the USA would let through a tanker or two just to keep the pressure high but not explosive?

deleted 5mo ago

[deleted]