3 ms·
you haven't made an argument for why stable rules are good nor have you justified the assertion that prosocial enforcement even exists
by nh23423fefe 5mo ago
you haven't made an argument for why stable rules are good nor have you justified the assertion that prosocial enforcement even exists
- ajkjk 5mo agoNor do I feel the need to, since my goal was only to present the obvious refutation to the (basically fascist) argument I was replying to. Anyway both are self-evident: prosocial enforcement exists because we see it around us every day and stable prosocial systems are good because people pick them, given the choice.
- nh23423fefe 5mo agowin argument button pressed lol, especially strong when mixed with shifting goal posts
- ajkjk 5mo agoYou're thinking of comment threads as some kind of high school debate contest? for some reason?
- nh23423fefe 5mo agoit seems to me like you have no aim at all.
- ajkjk 5mo agoMy aim was to communicate the thing that I wrote. Broadly, to supply the obvious refutation to the thing I replied to for any passing readers.