4 ms·
> I don't think most of the commenter so far are getting the real meaning of this post. That's the tricky part of blog titles, you have to assume 90% of the fu
by embedding-shape 6mo ago
> I don't think most of the commenter so far are getting the real meaning of this post.
That's the tricky part of blog titles, you have to assume 90% of the future commentators doesn't actually read the body nor conclusion, so if your title is the reverse of the argument you're trying to make, or something "fun" like that, you'll have 90% of the commentators misunderstanding what the basics of the article even is about.
- alex_smart 6mo agoIt doesn't help that the article is actually quite poorly written.
- jp_sc 6mo agoAt least you know it wasn’t written by AI… maybe it was left in a draft state because the author disliked the idea of being accused of writing it with AI
- fragmede 6mo agoThat makes it better? That's what bugs me about the anti-AI sentiment. I'm supposed to want to read worse, more poorly written work (like said article) because it has a human touch to it? Yes it would be great if everyone had perfect writing skills, but we're all human, so we don't. If someone uses an LLM to help them get their point across so it's easier to understand where they're coming from, why penalize them for it?
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]