3 ms·

that will not restore the job market... it'd just create an American system of struggle where you need to do doordash to make ends meet

• joe_mamba 5mo ago
  Doing doordash is "a system of struggle"? What about working in mines or on fishing boats? What about the Europeans who collect bottles to make ends meet? How did unskilled Europeans make ends meet before doordash and government welfare existed? Education and everything else related for the youth is free(taxpayer funded and government provided) in Europe. Whose responsibility is it to make ends meet other than your own? If you end up doing doordash after being provided all those generous opportunities in your youth, maybe some self reflection is needed. Should we keep taxing small business entrepreneurs and higher earners more, to subsidize the lower earners so adults can sit at home instead of doing doordash, while having food delivery service jobs be done by a parallel society comprised of desperate migrants and refugees, which need to be brought it endlessly to keep this ponzi scheme going, because the locals feel like it's below them. Is this better for Europe?
  • r_lee 5mo ago
    I'm not saying we should tax everybody, what I'm saying is that right now there simply isn't enough work for everybody, so if we get rid of these safety nets then we will get into a system of no education, no higher productivity, just simply people struggling because of economic conditions. we don't live in an age where we must struggle continously... if there's 1000 positions but 3000 people looking for jobs, do you suggest 2000 people are put out there to figure it out themselves? hopefully you get my idea here.