3 ms·
This guy is spot on. I've done quite a bit of time in the corporate environment running middleware systems such as LDAP and AD. Google Apps does not have a via
by jtchang 14y ago
This guy is spot on. I've done quite a bit of time in the corporate environment running middleware systems such as LDAP and AD.
Google Apps does not have a viable solution because it is not in house. There is no easy way to extend the schema and integrating with Google Apps is actually quite difficult. There are tools to help you integrate from Active Directory to Google Apps but not the other way around.
Also Active Directory is actually pretty awesome from a management standpoint. Suppose today you wanted to have 50k linux boxes with all the same logins. You would probably use LDAP (which is essentially AD under the hood). But how about automatic package management per user? How do you configure that? AD has all this built in and more.
- irq 14y ago> LDAP (which is essentially AD under the hood) This is false. LDAP itself is nothing more than a protocol (that's what the P stands for). There are very popular implementations of this protocol (OpenLDAP being just one) but even they are not "AD under the hood". AD = LDAP + Kerberos + Microsoft proprietary extensions So if anything, under the hood of AD you will find LDAP, but not the other way around.
- jtchang 14y agoI had that reversed. AD is at its base LDAP.