What a stupid and pointless blog post. His argument is completely unfounded. For example; in the comments, someone asks where Jimbo Wales would be considered

What a stupid and pointless blog post. His argument is completely unfounded. For example; in the comments, someone asks where Jimbo Wales would be considered an entrepreneur and the author of the blog says that Jimbo Wales is not an entrepreneur, because WikiPedia is not a for profit business. This a rather arbitrary definition of an entrepreneur. I checked both Dictionary.com and Merriam-Webster.com, and both of their definitions for entrepreneur do include room for entrepreneur who found non-profits. See for yourself: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entrepreneur http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entrepreneur http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/entrepreneur http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/entrepreneur Clearly the authors argument and conclusion is unfounded crap. Creating a long lasting and profitable commercial business is certainly a valid motivation for entrepreneurship, but so is changing the world, or even something as modest as looking to establish a second income stream, or looking for a different time/income tradeoff (4HWW, etc).