There are three options: 1. AI owned by everyone 2. No AI 3. AI owned by billionaires If you can make the poors fight for 2 instead of 1, then you guarantee

There are three options: 1. AI owned by everyone 2. No AI 3. AI owned by billionaires If you can make the poors fight for 2 instead of 1, then you guarantee that you don't get 1. If instead, the poors fight for 1, they've got a chance of getting it. You present AI as a false dichotomy: no AI or AI for billionaires. Any of us arguing for (1) get shouted down by the very people who would benefit most from it. The poors do the job of the billionaires.