4 ms·
What about this article do you find questionable? I think it would help to prove your point if you included specific examples. The article seemed fine to me.
by freetime2 5mo ago
What about this article do you find questionable? I think it would help to prove your point if you included specific examples.
The article seemed fine to me.
- cityofdelusion 5mo agoElectrek has a long history of going between blind fanboyism and blind hate, the history is all there to peruse. They only changed their tune with the referral program debacle a few years back which was seen as a betrayal. It’s hard to trust “reporting” when it’s historically operated more like a tabloid.
- freetime2 5mo agoI feel that way about the NY Post - a literal tabloid. Occasionally someone shares a story from the NY Post with me, and my first instinct is to think "why are you sharing this rubbish with me". But then I read story - often with the intent of pointing out why it's rubbish, and sure enough more often than not it actually is rubbish - and point out the issues with the reporting. But sometimes it's not. I'll do my own fact checking (because I don't trust them) - and find out that maybe there is something to the story. Not only that - none of the sources that I typically read are reporting on the issue. And then I'm forced to admit that I actually learned something from the NY Post. And usually I've learned something about my own biases and bias in my regular information sources, too. My point is this: if you can't get past the source of an article and actually engage with the content - then that says more about your own bias and trustworthiness as a source of information than it does about Electrek.