3 ms·
Shouldn’t it be a part of the harness at least for local codebase? I wonder how many harnesses are doing that already.
by abcdefg12 5mo ago
Shouldn’t it be a part of the harness at least for local codebase? I wonder how many harnesses are doing that already.
- dopidopHN2 5mo agoI'm playing with PI as a custom harness ( for Claude code because that what is provided to me ) I will try that ! It make sense and I'm curious to see results, for this or any similar projects mentioned in the thread
- molszanski 5mo agoallegedly this one is good for PI https://pi.dev/packages/@ff-labs/pi-fff https://pi.dev/packages/@ff-labs/pi-fff
- Bibabomas 5mo agoAfaik many harnesses ship the "default" which is grep+read (like Claude Code). But I agree, IMO it's a weird gap. To be fair I don't think providers are that incentivised to reduce token burn at the moment, but my guess is that that will change and tools like this will become at least an natively supported option in some harnesses.
- sincerely 5mo agoI would be surprised if, in the "mature" future of AI tools/products, the labs building the models are also selling/building to end users like they are now.
- losvedir 5mo agoWould or wouldn't be? I think it makes sense that they will be because of the feedback loop on training. The lab generates tons of example text as part of the training run and if they have that using their own tools then the models will tend to prefer those tools.