3 ms·
For throwing the tea into the harbor. By the way -- Where do you stand on throwing tea into the harbor? And where do you stand on the legitimacy of publicly di
by zug_zug 5mo ago
For throwing the tea into the harbor.
By the way -- Where do you stand on throwing tea into the harbor? And where do you stand on the legitimacy of publicly discussing throwing tea into the harbor?
- amazingamazing 5mo ago[flagged]
- pydry 5mo agoIt's not complicated. They are in favor of public vandalism such as that which was committed by the Boston Tea Party whereas you appear to be suggesting that you are vehemently against it.
- mothballed 5mo agoWhat a load of shit. You're essentially goading someone to fedpost and holding their argument hostage if they don't.
- dandellion 5mo agoWhat riddle? I'm not a native English speaker, and it's pretty clear even to me what he's saying.
- zug_zug 5mo agoBased on the number of upvotes I'm getting I think it's you who's really struggling to make a point. I don't think your arguing in good faith and you are getting called out on it by a few people. So you answer first, then I'll answer -- Was the boston tea party justified? Is civil disobedience ever justified? Is breaking the law a good thing sometimes if it's a bad law (e.g. Rosa Parks)? If you can't answer those then I think you'll have convinced me and the rest of us that you aren't even trying to make a good-faith effort to make a point.
- amazingamazing 5mo agoAgain this is not the Boston Tea Party or the Civil Rights movement. I also don’t really care about upvotes either. You keep making comparisons with the past instead of explicitly stating your opinion on the topic at hand in the article. Anyway no point of further discourse.