3 ms·
That’s a really shallow interpretation of the data. 1. The safety inspections were never rigorous to begin with. Everyone who drives a piece of shit car in a s
by kube-system 5mo ago
That’s a really shallow interpretation of the data.
1. The safety inspections were never rigorous to begin with. Everyone who drives a piece of shit car in a state with safety inspections “knows a guy”. And in many urban areas, you can just drive around without an inspection.
2. Police very rarely sit at the roadside doing root cause analysis after an accident. If somebody loses control of their vehicle, they write a report for insurance or at most write them a ticket for failure to maintain control. So of course you don’t see a measurable increase in accidents due to faulty equipment. It’s because they rarely look for faulty equipment after an accident. So they aren’t measuring it.