3 ms·
(having no first hand experience with WG21) Many people think there are a lot of problems with C++ committee and the standards process. Some would claim that t
by fg137 5mo ago
(having no first hand experience with WG21)
Many people think there are a lot of problems with C++ committee and the standards process. Some would claim that the ISO governance model doesn't work at all. There is a lot of drama that the outside world has no idea about, because much of the discussion is behind closed doors.
You can look it up (e.g. on blogs and /r/cpp), but I am not linking to anything because lots of content is very biased and hard to verify.
Something that is not controversial and worth a read is https://thephd.dev/embed-the-details https://thephd.dev/embed-the-details and you can see the point.
I do feel the TC39 (the group behind the ECMAScript/JavaScript standard) seems more practical and effective. There are disagreements and dramas but not nearly as bad as with C++.
- germandiago 5mo agoThe best witness to the committee (I do not think it is that bad) is to check C++ pre 11 and C++26. There will always be things people want or comolaints. But the list of useful features and fixes is very long. But you always see the contentious topics at the top, shadowing a lot (most) of the work that is delivered.