Two thoughts amused me. Firstly: There's a 2025 (sic!) erratum to RFC 1055 that isn't in the www.c here. The erratum (q.v.) makes a good case for how it chang

Two thoughts amused me. Firstly: There's a 2025 (sic!) erratum to RFC 1055 that isn't in the www.c here. The erratum (q.v.) makes a good case for how it changes the decoding algorithm, and it actually is Linux on the other end of the link in this case. Secondly: Next stop RFC 1144, presumably.