3 ms·
If the weird syntax of APL and J bothers you, you can use the familiar Haskell syntax! Jokes aside, types should help a lot.
by nine_k 5mo ago
If the weird syntax of APL and J bothers you, you can use the familiar Haskell syntax!
Jokes aside, types should help a lot.
- shawn_w 5mo agoI'm sure you can define enough new infix operators that the Haskell ends up resembling APL if you miss that style enough.