3 ms·
Ironic. You are admitting that you yourself don't want to be near these people who are going to get put in detention centres (who would probably otherwise be fr
by hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 5mo ago
Ironic. You are admitting that you yourself don't want to be near these people who are going to get put in detention centres (who would probably otherwise be free).
- KaiserPro 5mo agoCan you please explain to me how you managed to divine my preference for immigrants from my post? I would gently point out that if the immigration system worked like it used to, then we wouldn't need large amounts of detention centres. For two years it was illegal to process asylum claims. This meant that the backlog stacked up, costing a fuck tonne of cash. More egregiously instead of sorting the problem. Various Home secretaries chose politics rather than building systems to track and efficiently process claims. Detention centres are a massive sign of failure. I don't want them anywhere, I want my money to be spent on sorting the problem not showboating how cruel we are to people we don't like. (Which I would point out is directly against biblical teachings)
- graemep 5mo ago> Which I would point out is directly against biblical teachings Which politicians do you expect to follow Biblical teachings? As far as I can see all of the main are fundamentally opposed to Biblical teachings. Which politician can you imagine giving all they have to the poor, for example :) > Various Home secretaries chose politics rather than building systems to track and efficiently process claims. That is true. The system is a complete mess, highly inefficient, and ineffective in accurately assessing claims. > Can you please explain to me how you managed to divine my preference for immigrants from my post Maybe not you, but as I said in another comment it has made it awkward for some - the Green party in particular have been made to look hypocritical.