2 ms·
Like we had done for the 10 years prior? Don’t think so. BTW the ai code is as readable as the human’s. Never had to call out people on the AI code being unread
by brabel 5mo ago
Like we had done for the 10 years prior? Don’t think so. BTW the ai code is as readable as the human’s. Never had to call out people on the AI code being unreadable.
- vrganj 5mo agoI have not had the same experience. In the PRs I have read, AI accomplishes in 300 very verbose lines what a competent human could in like 60, quintupling cognitive load to review.
- brabel 5mo agoBut that's so easy to fix! I can't believe people complain about stuff like this. The person making the PR could've told the AI "hey you can easily reduce the amount of code by using this technique" or whatever... or saying you prefer concise code than verbose code in the system prompt so the AI behaves how you want it to... If you can't do any of that, and I can guarantee that if you did you wouldn't have this problem, then you're not really trying.
- vrganj 5mo agoIt's structurally impossible to fix I've addressed why in a response to a similar claim here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157898 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157898