> That doesn't mean that he abandoned his values. This was exactly my point. The parent was suggesting that MLK compromised on his stance but presented only e

> That doesn't mean that he abandoned his values. This was exactly my point. The parent was suggesting that MLK compromised on his stance but presented only evidence of a change in tactics. I agree completely with your other assertions. I think it would help to distinguish that there are really 2 arguments happening here, muddying the waters: Unwavering belief and unwavering actions. I personally think that unwavering belief in something is commendable and this is where my comments have come from. I think this is necessary in order to effect any real change as the process is usually long and arduous. Unwavering commitment to a losing tactic, as danso points out, is stubborn and foolish. A person who is unable to adapt when facing challenges does no favors for their cause.