3 ms·
What's the argument here? Thats crimes should be forgiven after 16 years, or that facial recognition is demonstrably robust?
by nomel 5mo ago
What's the argument here? Thats crimes should be forgiven after 16 years, or that facial recognition is demonstrably robust?
- sverhagen 5mo agoThat it's a fishy story?
- novok 5mo agoHe is implying he doubts the accuracy of that 'match'.
- walletdrainer 5mo ago> Thats crimes should be forgiven after 16 years That’s very common, yes.
- croisillon 5mo agonot understanding written words is one thing, but your lack of basic maths is appalling
- nomel 5mo agoPlease re-read your comment. What you wrote is as a question not a statement. And, you did it in a way that suggests it's loaded. Forcing others to infer the motivation of a disingenuous question, so they can try to extract some statement it might be making, is a poor way to communicate, because they will get it wrong, because it required understanding the mindset that you're asking the fake question from. It's best to state statements and leave the questions for queries.