Isn't the McCabe metric simply a measure of software complexity? This method is designed for individual modules. Here you've applied for the complete system. W

Isn't the McCabe metric simply a measure of software complexity? This method is designed for individual modules. Here you've applied for the complete system. What sense does this make? Resulting metric is not conveying any meaningful information. And higher numbers mean its not necessarily worse; it just means the program is more complex, which may be due to more functionality. Right way to compare it - Level the scope of the frameworks (e.g. add SQLAlchemy to pyramids) and compare again. Bring all to equal levels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCabe_Metric https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCabe_Metric