Interesting! Where did you apply it? Can you show your output in more detail? It's more like a small script, and it's supposed to extract urls and generate a t

Interesting! Where did you apply it? Can you show your output in more detail? It's more like a small script, and it's supposed to extract urls and generate a table. Here's my result in Claude Web for comparison: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/d76936f2-c97b-4bff-9205-23474b5970c5 https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/d76936f2-c97b-4bff-9205-2... Claude web finds a number of small discrepancies in the sources, which I manually crosschecked and seem consistent with a human mixing things up slightly. + I also tested in gemini 3 flash preview, which generates an actual table (twice). It doesn't flag any discrepancies, which is consistent with it being a weaker model. But the urls and claims are listed and line up, so you've got your verification table to work with. (it's a semantic formatting task, so that part would be hard to mess up) + Gemini 3.1 pro yields a fairly aggressive report. https://aistudio.google.com/app/prompts?state=%7B%22ids%22:%5B%221s8fhl_INrav1OTY47woC6VHnVEx8xBa4%22%5D,%22action%22:%22open%22,%22userId%22:%22112986444731006327669%22,%22resourceKeys%22:%7B%7D%7D&usp=sharing https://aistudio.google.com/app/prompts?state=%7B%22ids%22:%... + ChatGPT free (specific model not listed) needed 2 tries, didn't properly follow the prompt even then. I guess I got what I paid for, and I needed to download; https://vps.kimbruning.nl/productivity/Ai%20Productivity%20Article%20Link%20Audit%20Report.pdf https://vps.kimbruning.nl/productivity/Ai%20Productivity%20A... (pdf), https://vps.kimbruning.nl/productivity/ai_productivity_article_link_audit_report.md https://vps.kimbruning.nl/productivity/ai_productivity_artic... (md) + Kimi K2.6 instant: https://www.kimi.com/share/19e2cc40-d012-89bf-8000-00006267f6a7 https://www.kimi.com/share/19e2cc40-d012-89bf-8000-00006267f... + Summary of results. https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/10a42111-a0ee-42f3-b6d2-ab85f22a1a03 https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/10a42111-a0ee-42f3-b6d2-a... All of the models extracted the URLs into a table just fine, and that part at least is a lot easier than writing a perl script used to be in the '90s ;-) . The first part is the important bit so you as a human can "check your fucking sources". The second part the models handle variously, each does find discrepancies. None of them find all of them, but that makes sense: this is a fairly polished piece and it ideally shouldn't have discrepancies at all to begin with. So: it worked as a smoke check just fine in the above. Doing more than a quick smoke check obviously requires a somewhat more involved procedure.