3 ms·
It's easy to be secure if you just remove features. There's obvious tension here.
by StilesCrisis 5mo ago
It's easy to be secure if you just remove features. There's obvious tension here.
- Aachen 5mo agoCould you be any more specific about what features they've removed such that the hardening functions work? Because I think there are none
- StilesCrisis 5mo agoThey're quite open about it. https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction https://grapheneos.org/features#attack-surface-reduction
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 5mo agoYou said removing features. This link is talking about making certain feautures optional and disabled by default, not removing them.
- StilesCrisis 5mo agoDid you happen to notice the phrase "stripping out code" in the first sentence?
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 5mo agoAnd which features have been removed, as you claim? Removing code is not necessarily removing features. I use GOS and I honestly can't think of a missing feature compared to the stock OS, other than stuff not in AOSP in the first place, like gemini.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- marysol5 5mo agoDisabled, is removed... Removed from operation
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 5mo agoDon't be ridiculous.
- Aachen 5mo ago> disabling optional features by default (NFC, Bluetooth, UWB, etc.), when the screen is locked (USB, USB-C, pogo pins, camera access) and optionally after a timeout (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi). Erm, okay if this makes you think the phones don't have WiFi or NFC or something, you've been misinformed