3 ms·
One week ago, the same publication covered the opposite argument from a16z, stating that "The AI job apocalypse is ‘unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse
by sharmston 6mo ago
One week ago, the same publication covered the opposite argument from a16z, stating that "The AI job apocalypse is ‘unhelpful marketing, bad economics and worse history" - it's too early to declare which way this is going. https://fortune.com/2026/05/07/ai-job-apocalypse-unhelpful-marketing-bad-economics-worse-history/ https://fortune.com/2026/05/07/ai-job-apocalypse-unhelpful-m...
- zeroonetwothree 6mo agoWhatever gets them clicks
- phyzix5761 6mo agoExactly, this is the real purpose of news and media. They are for-profit businesses. If anyone treats any of them as neutral altruist sources of real information then they're deluding themselves.
- red-iron-pine 6mo ago"remember the Maine"
- Michelangelo11 6mo ago> A long time ago, a client and a friend were both subjects of some inaccurate speculation in a Gawker story. One of them emailed Mr. Daulerio to deny it and was told by a surprisingly honest Mr. Daulerio that he “could give a fuck” about the actual truth of the story—and that my client and friend were welcome to cover their asses how they liked. And then he dropped a line that now drips with irony considering how things have ended up. “I don’t know, man,“ he said, “It’s all professional wrestling.” https://observer.com/2016/03/goodbye-and-good-riddance-gawker-and-awful-gawker-like-media-finally-exposed/ https://observer.com/2016/03/goodbye-and-good-riddance-gawke...