3 ms·
I interpreted the OP suggesting that you not use a single multiparadigm language because then you won't be forced to follow the new principle everywhere. Of cou
by spicyj 14y ago
I interpreted the OP suggesting that you not use a single multiparadigm language because then you won't be forced to follow the new principle everywhere. Of course, it's possible to do (for example) OOP in a lisp-like language, but you'll really be forced to work with it in a language like Java, which may give you a deeper understanding.
- jfb 14y agoWell, avoid Java, which is just C++--, and think Smalltalk instead.
- klez 14y agoTherefore Java == C?
- jfb 14y agoWell, only shittier.
- evincarofautumn 14y agoI don’t think programming languages have inverses, so in general λ + 1 − 1 ≠ λ.