4 ms·
The rise of internal recruiting teams is definitely promising. We work with a lot of companies that are smaller and/or growing at a slower rate and therefore ca
by cliftonmckinney 14y ago
The rise of internal recruiting teams is definitely promising. We work with a lot of companies that are smaller and/or growing at a slower rate and therefore can't justify a full time equivalent for recruiting. They're hiring maybe three or four people a year. For those kinds of orgs I think "making it a core activity" is just as important, and perhaps more difficult because they can't justify full time help.
Good on you if you've figured out the formula for retaining employees that are potentially on their way out the door. I'll stand by my statement that it doesn't happen often. I'd love to read a blog post about how to do it successfully! :)
- Peroni 14y agoI'd love to read a blog post about how to do it successfully! I've been looking for inspiration for my next blog post and now I've got it! You might be interested in my own musings on the recruitment industry: http://hackerjobs.co.uk/blog/2012/6/15/all-that-is-wrong-with-the-recruitment-industry http://hackerjobs.co.uk/blog/2012/6/15/all-that-is-wrong-wit...
- tomjen3 14y agoThe trick, when you can't afford good full time help is to look part time, or hire somebody on a retainer (which would be the best in your case, given that they probaly do need help at least full time when they are hiring). And yes, you will pay more per hour going that route than the traditional full time. But lets be serious -- if you are hiring people the difference between 20k and 25k isn't that much.