4 ms·

Radicle is really underrated, especially when working with agents. I find it a joy to use for my agentic workflows. If there's purely an agentic forge one day,

by h1watt 5mo ago

Radicle is really underrated, especially when working with agents. I find it a joy to use for my agentic workflows. If there's purely an agentic forge one day, it's likely going to be a distributed one, with cryptographic identities and signed artifacts by default.

eightysixfour 5mo ago
What makes it a joy to use with agents?
- k__ 5mo ago
  Probably less issues with account management and rate limits.
endiangroup 5mo ago
AD: Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] about your experiences of agentic workflow if you haven't already! Some of the team are interested in developing the agentic workflow experience. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/ https://radicle.zulipchat.com/
- chrisweekly 5mo ago
  "AD" ?
  - KolmogorovComp 5mo ago
    Advertisement
  - deleted 5mo ago
    [deleted]
  - asibahi 5mo ago
    His initials
- xvilka 5mo ago
  I am surprised you don't use RustChat[1] [1] https://rustchat.io/ https://rustchat.io/
  - jejejejjejei 5mo ago
    [dead]
  - arunc 5mo ago
    Doesn't even come close to Zulip in terms of features.
    - culi 5mo ago
      Zulip used to have a really neat feature where you could open up certain channels to be indexable by search engines. Basically turning it into an open forum. The feature is still sorta around but completely broken. Quite unfortunate imo. It was a really neat solution to the walled garden problem with team chats
      - alya 5mo ago
        Zulip product lead here -- I'm not aware of anything in this space that used to work and no longer does. There's long been a way to make Zulip channels searchable with zulip-archive (https://github.com/zulip/zulip-archive https://github.com/zulip/zulip-archive), and that continues to be available. Making the app-native web-public channels accessible to search engines is a big technical project, tracked as https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881 https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881.
        culi 5mo ago
        Ah thanks for the correction. For some reason I mixed up Zulip with Linen.dev https://www.linen.dev/ https://www.linen.dev/ I guess this feature has been requested for Zulip for a long time https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881 https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881
  - 5mo ago

by h1watt 5mo ago

eightysixfour 5mo ago

What makes it a joy to use with agents?

k__ 5mo ago
Probably less issues with account management and rate limits.

endiangroup 5mo ago

AD: Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] about your experiences of agentic workflow if you haven't already! Some of the team are interested in developing the agentic workflow experience. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/ https://radicle.zulipchat.com/

chrisweekly 5mo ago
"AD" ?
- KolmogorovComp 5mo ago
  Advertisement
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
- asibahi 5mo ago
  His initials
xvilka 5mo ago
I am surprised you don't use RustChat[1] [1] https://rustchat.io/ https://rustchat.io/
- jejejejjejei 5mo ago
  [dead]
- arunc 5mo ago
  Doesn't even come close to Zulip in terms of features.
  - culi 5mo ago
    Zulip used to have a really neat feature where you could open up certain channels to be indexable by search engines. Basically turning it into an open forum. The feature is still sorta around but completely broken. Quite unfortunate imo. It was a really neat solution to the walled garden problem with team chats
    - alya 5mo ago
      Zulip product lead here -- I'm not aware of anything in this space that used to work and no longer does. There's long been a way to make Zulip channels searchable with zulip-archive (https://github.com/zulip/zulip-archive https://github.com/zulip/zulip-archive), and that continues to be available. Making the app-native web-public channels accessible to search engines is a big technical project, tracked as https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881 https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881.
      - culi 5mo ago
        Ah thanks for the correction. For some reason I mixed up Zulip with Linen.dev https://www.linen.dev/ https://www.linen.dev/ I guess this feature has been requested for Zulip for a long time https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881 https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/21881
- 5mo ago