4 ms·
"Always free" was never sustainable for a password manager that took VC money and now needs growth at all costs [0]. Obviously predictable. Bitwarden is now in
by rvz 6mo ago
"Always free" was never sustainable for a password manager that took VC money and now needs growth at all costs [0].
Obviously predictable. Bitwarden is now in the extraction phase and it is now time to pay an expensive...
...$1.65 a month.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34427981 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34427981
- cicko 6mo agoCompared with KeePassXC and Syncthing, it is infinitely more expensive!
- TurkTurkleton 6mo agoOh yeah, I love having to manage sync conflicts in my password database because I was dumb enough to edit it on two separate computers that weren't both online at the same time.
- rpdillon 6mo agoWorks best if you have an always on client. Easy if you have a VPS or a home lab, even a small one, a nuisance if you don't.
- asdfqwertzxcv 6mo agoI have that and still have regular sync conflicts. :(
- redsocksfan45 6mo ago[dead]
- sigio 6mo agoYeah, my main reason to stay away from Keepass, everything is in a single versioned binary file. I like 'passwordstore.org', where every secret is it's own gpg-encrypted textfile in a git repo. Every change is a commit, easy to see history, easy to revert or know which version is newest. And easy to selfhost, you just need a place to git push/pull from.
- cicko 5mo agoWhat's to manage? A merge does the job.
- BoredPositron 6mo agoLook at the CEOs other "ventures" he is a private equity squeeze guy.