7 ms·
I have a way higher hopes for higher framerates than for higher resolutions. I'm more excited about 48 Hz or 60 Hz than about 4K or 8K. But I can't read the ar
by fosap 14y ago
I have a way higher hopes for higher framerates than for higher resolutions. I'm more excited about 48 Hz or 60 Hz than about 4K or 8K.
But I can't read the article. It redirects to google.
- ImprovedSilence 14y agoReally? I'm still in love with the higher definition. I'm a big sports fan, and I could never go back to a lower resolution. Especially for hockey, my goodness does HD make it look soo much better. Higher frame rates would be nice too, don't get me wrong, but I think resolution is more important to me. (I could be wrong, I'll let you know when they start shooting airing sports at 60fps)
- MichaelGG 14y agoI think he's referring to even higher resolutions, above 1080p (approximately 2K in resolution, since it's 1080 x1 920). At the moment, there's no consumer (as in, under a few $K) displays that'll even show 4K (3840 x 2160), so going even higher to 8K is not really helping anyone out, any time soon. Whereas all these systems are capable of running at 60fps, so that's an improvement you can actually use. Apart from that, we've been stuck at 24fps for a long time. It's very noticeable on any film that has any action in: jarring, blurred, choppy sequences.