4 ms·
So not familiar with the caselaw around work product, but if you use an API tool directly and not the different chat tools, the queries are not permanently cach
by apwheele 5mo ago
So not familiar with the caselaw around work product, but if you use an API tool directly and not the different chat tools, the queries are not permanently cached for anyone to give up in the end.
So basically if you use any of the CLI tools, there is nothing for OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. to give the courts.
Online ChatGPT (especially the free version), are apparently cached by OpenAI on their servers. (I am not sure if Claude Desktop caches the conversations locally or in the cloud as well, read the fine print if it matters!)
- trollbridge 5mo agoIndeed, there is no way my terabytes per day of API calls is getting permanently stored anywhere. Perhaps an AI generated summary of it is.
- skeeter2020 5mo agointeresting angle - how are/would compressed context (i.e. the parts of the user-LLM transcription likely to be saved) be treated by the courts? Would this be considered hearsay?
- nerdsniper 5mo agoIt would be treated as evidence, and the defense would be free to argue that it carries very little weight. The judge or jury would be free to decide how meaningful it is.