3 ms·
Why would smaller and worse models not be 80% cheaper? If I can run those models on my consumer hardware, I'd better believe they are 80% cheaper than the mode
by iLoveOncall 5mo ago
Why would smaller and worse models not be 80% cheaper?
If I can run those models on my consumer hardware, I'd better believe they are 80% cheaper than the models that need 1 TB of RAM.
- graemep 5mo agoComment from poster says they are offering Deepseek v4-Pro. Cannot find any details on website.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- ttoinou 5mo agoIts written Input Price: £1.17 Output Price: £2.33 So, slightly cheaper than Fireworks AI
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- anentropic 5mo agoclick "Models and Pricing" in the left menu https://relax.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing https://relax.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing
- benjamintnorris 5mo agoFor the very hardest reasoning tasks GPT-5 and Opus are still ahead, no argument there. But what we see in practice is customers dropping in an open-source model and getting very similar results on 80-90% of real-world use cases — with significant cost savings and end-to-end UK data residency (which matters a lot for our enterprise and institutional customers). And on the consumer-hardware point: these are Blackwell GPUs in a UK datacentre, in a token factory architecture.
- l_c_m 5mo agoThis is very disingenuous, I've been deploying local models to enterprise across a variety of use cases and the optimisation overhead and prompt engineering required to get good performance is huge. Let alone comparative perf to frontier models.