3 ms·
Option 2 would almost be workable if you had a very streamlined system for implementing revisions, to prevent more than one individual from exploiting a loophol
by rapind 14y ago
Option 2 would almost be workable if you had a very streamlined system for implementing revisions, to prevent more than one individual from exploiting a loophole before it's closed.
Like a group of elected officials who's only job is to close these loopholes without massive fanfare and a simple vote. A process that is incredibly fast and decisive in order to get double digits done per day.
- saidajigumi 14y ago> A process that is incredibly fast and decisive in order to get double digits done per day. Because, y'know, having officials crank through tons of difficult decisions per day is such a supremely effective[1] and corruption-free way to create a social process. It's worked so very well for the patent system, why not for law and jursiprudence? [1] cf. "decision fatigue": https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/magazine/do-you-suffer-from-decision-fatigue.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/magazine/do-you-suffer-fr...