3 ms·
Going to be interesting to see if they adapt their messaging to be more explicit about who their beneficiaries are, or just stop soliciting in CA. Seems like a
by apparent 5mo ago
Going to be interesting to see if they adapt their messaging to be more explicit about who their beneficiaries are, or just stop soliciting in CA. Seems like a good chunk of their donations could come from CA, so it'd be a big loss. Maybe they'll instead spin up some CA-based beneficiaries so they can maintain their mission without having to be more explicit about who is benefiting exactly.
- EtienneDeLyon 5mo agoThere are no "beneficiaries" it's a grift!
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- apparent 5mo agoI think the kids who get to go to camp or Israel for free are beneficiaries. It's not like all of the money goes to executives' salaries, right?
- FireBeyond 5mo agoMaybe look at PA and OH to see what they did there - since courts in those states have separately ruled in a similar manner.