3 ms·
> No, it is emphatically not. D Fraud requires intent to deceive. I'm about as pro AI-as-a-research--and-writing-assistant and anti AI-witchhunt as they come,
by NiloCK 5mo ago
> No, it is emphatically not. D Fraud requires intent to deceive.
I'm about as pro AI-as-a-research--and-writing-assistant and anti AI-witchhunt as they come, but I simply cannot parse what I've quoted here.
Posting slop to arxiv is blatant deception. Posting an article is an attestation that the article is a genuine engagement with the literature. If you're posting things to arxiv that are not sincere engagements with the literature, you are attempting to deceive.
- protocolture 5mo ago>I'm about as pro AI-as-a-research--and-writing-assistant and anti AI-witchhunt as they come, but I simply cannot parse what I've quoted here. Ditto. And its only 1 year. Like its about the most reasonable thing they could have done.
- dataflow 5mo ago> And its only 1 year No, it emphatically is not just a year! It's perpetual, and that's literally been my entire point this whole time. If it was just one year I would've had no complaints - and I made that clear from the very first comment! What part of "...followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue..." is everyone here reading and still somehow interpreting to be limited to 1 year?
- fc417fc802 5mo agoYou are equating cutting corners (ie laziness) with intentional deception and not being genuine. That doesn't seem accurate to me. In most contexts I think cutting corners would be taken to be some form of negligence or recklessness. Regardless of terminology, I agree that it's certainly punishable and certainly a serious problem.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]