This is really one of the worst articles I've seen submitted here lately. I'm truly surprised that it is currently ranked up so high. The presentation of the a

This is really one of the worst articles I've seen submitted here lately. I'm truly surprised that it is currently ranked up so high. The presentation of the article is atrocious. The font alone renders extremely poorly in Firefox. It is just plain hard to read. Please just use a common font that will render well basically anywhere. The inline "$3.99 ThanksGiving Offer" ad links peppered throughout the article are distracting, too. They really take focus away from the article itself (unless, of course, that is exactly what they were intended to do). Then it has one part that goes, "It’s the WebP Image Format (see https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/ https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/) as shown here", with an image of the WebP logo that follows. The WebP logo image is a PNG, however! With a lead-in like that, I was sure it was going to be a WebP image demonstrating some of the format's benefits. The various inline URLs that aren't hyperlinks are very annoying, too. They should obviously have been actual links. Seeing stuff like "Microsfot" only makes the horrible article look even worse. While I'm not expecting perfection, nearly everything about this article is sub-par. It's not what I wish to see when I come to HN. When it comes to information, the Wikipedia article is so much better, yet it's still quite concise, too. For anyone interested, it is at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP