3 ms·
> NTSYNC isn't faster, it's more "correct". It depends on what you're using now, though. If you're just using a vanilla wine/proton install, then NTSYNC shoul
by kelnos 6mo ago
> NTSYNC isn't faster, it's more "correct".
It depends on what you're using now, though. If you're just using a vanilla wine/proton install, then NTSYNC should indeed be a lot faster as well. If you're using fsync or... I forget the name of the other one... then you many not see much in the way of perf improvements.
- mackal 6mo agoEsync was the other one. Basically either of those enabled (honestly probably both were) and it didn't hit a corner case with issues, NTSYNC is basically no benefit. (I personally would rather use NTSYNC)