3 ms·
> Of course the safest (first) option is the correct option from a liability standpoint, which is all a company should operate on since it's first responsibilit
by mquander 5mo ago
> Of course the safest (first) option is the correct option from a liability standpoint, which is all a company should operate on since it's first responsibility is to protect the company for those that are still there.
Isn't this an unrealistically black-and-white mode of thinking? Humans are complicated and have many values and perceived responsibilities. It's not healthy for them to throw them all out and act as if they only have one responsibility that needs to be maximally upheld at all costs. They should balance their actions thoughtfully.
- lazide 5mo agoSo, never lived in corp land? Healthy isn’t on most corporations radars except where it causes liability to them.
- mquander 5mo agoI haven't, but the parent said that this is what a company "should" do, not just what they do do.
- avereveard 5mo agoSystem security is not a human value. Access key rotation effective immediately is a compliance requirement, and completely orthogonal to human decency, which is delivered trough garden leave or severance, not extended system access