3 ms·
Uhh... The guy in charge of the whole thing does things a foreign adversary would do. Has for years and he's back for round two. He even tried to overthrow the
by leptons 5mo ago
Uhh... The guy in charge of the whole thing does things a foreign adversary would do. Has for years and he's back for round two. He even tried to overthrow the government once.
- Our_Benefactors 5mo agoHe wasn’t hired, he was elected.
- leptons 5mo agoThat's a bit pedantic. There's really not much of a difference there. He can be fired too, but the current shitheads in charge would never do that.
- Our_Benefactors 5mo ago> There's really not much of a difference there. Between being hired and being elected? There’s a massive difference and it’s not pedantic at all to point out the ridiculousness of a statement like “the president was hired”.
- leptons 5mo agoIt's a common colloquialism to say "America hired him to do a job" referring to the POTUS. From a simple query... "It is common to use the phrase "hired" when discussing the U.S. Presidency in a metaphorical or political context, particularly to emphasize that the President is a public servant working for the citizens. While the official process is "electing," the "hired" analogy is frequently used to highlight accountability, public service, and temporary, contractual-like tenure" Just go look it up, and educate yourself. But this pointless internet interaction is over.