3 ms·
I'm struggling to even understand what you have in mind, because HN doesn't do Markdown formatting and asterisks are interpreted for emphasis across lines. But
by zahlman 6mo ago
I'm struggling to even understand what you have in mind, because HN doesn't do Markdown formatting and asterisks are interpreted for emphasis across lines. But I've never really thought there was a problem with the syntax. To me it reads naturally, left to right: "A list ([) of the results from calculating whatever, (for) each of the (name) values that are (in) the (names) container". With multiple clauses, they're in the same order as the corresponding imperative code, which also makes sense. (Perhaps if "for" were spelled "where", it might not...)
- ruszki 6mo agoYou can create a natural sentence for every permutation. There is an asterisk between mat and 2. mat asterisk 2. f(2) is a multiplication of mat.