4 ms·
SourceHut sounds very close to what you describe: https://sr.ht/ https://sr.ht/
by epicide 5mo ago
SourceHut sounds very close to what you describe: https://sr.ht/ https://sr.ht/
- nickzelei 5mo agoI’ve had my eye on this platform. Generally like their design and ethos too. However I find their code viewer/navigation a little hard for my eye. But maybe I’m just too used to GitHub.
- epicide 5mo agoSure. If you really wanted to, I think the pages are simple enough that you could add your own CSS tweaks via a basic browser plugin (or whatever is the current go-to plugin for doing this). For me, I only use a forge's viewer/navigation for cursory glances or sharing links to others. If I need to spend any real time digging, I'll clone the repo.
- nottorp 5mo agoNo one notices the part about private repos and access control...
- jorams 5mo agoYou didn't mention private repos in your comment, but I guess that was implied in the $7 thing. That said: SourceHut has private repos and access control.
- nottorp 5mo ago> SourceHut has private repos and access control ... but not on the sr.ht link you gave. That's a list of projects like your average open source hosting landing page. You have to click on the tiny sourcehut link at the top to see the real site.
- epicide 5mo agoRight, I always forget that the sr.ht link is to the application itself. For anybody else who needs it, the page with info about the service is here: https://sourcehut.org/ https://sourcehut.org/