3 ms·
This is why I asked: >And why not take the alternative approach of identifying the subset of people who have indeed found solid uses and spread their best prac
by the_snooze 5mo ago
This is why I asked:
>And why not take the alternative approach of identifying the subset of people who have indeed found solid uses and spread their best practices around?
A bottom-up approach has a far better chance of finding those particularly good use cases, and if you lean on the people how found those fits, they're more persuasive than top-down edicts. They actually know what they're talking about. If the point is to leverage AI for better work outcomes, someone with your experience is far more valuable than "here's a dashboard, make the number go up," which seems to be what's going on at Amazon.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- tverbeure 5mo agoHow do you know up front who will find the best use cases? Both approaches can work.
- judahmeek 5mo agoI'd bet my life savings that the person who is forced to use a tool by top-down edict is less likely to find a valuable use case than the person who is sincerely curious about said tool.
- tverbeure 5mo agoYour mistake is thinking that all people who don't use it are doing so because they're not curious about it.