4 ms·
For parallel read/write access across many thousands of large-ish files (ie multiples of the minimum chunk size) I'm sure it does grand. But for metadata heavy
by KaiserPro 5mo ago
For parallel read/write access across many thousands of large-ish files (ie multiples of the minimum chunk size) I'm sure it does grand.
But for metadata heavy operations, ie git, its not the FS I would choose. like lustre it can be fast, if your workload aligns with it's tradeoffs. but high metadata loads are not ceph-fs's strong point, (or many other distributed filesystems either)