4 ms·
> Why pay $500-700 for Mac Book Neo for the same low processing power experience that you can get on a Googlebook for half the price? What makes you think a go
by Shekelphile 5mo ago
> Why pay $500-700 for Mac Book Neo for the same low processing power experience that you can get on a Googlebook for half the price?
What makes you think a googlebook will be half the price of a macbook neo?
Also, a used M1 macbook air is $300 on swappa/ebay and will be even better than the neo anyway. It's still more performant than every other non-Apple ARM based laptop/chromebook on the market and will have far superior build quality.
- lern_too_spel 5mo agoKompanio Ultra Chromebooks are faster and have a touch screen for use as a tablet or developing mobile-friendly apps. No point in a MacBook Air.
- Shekelphile 5mo ago> Kompanio Ultra Chromebooks are faster Lol. There is zero chance the low end mobile phone SoC shipped in those is remotely as fast as a six year old M1. Even flagship SoCs from qualcomm and samsung still do not exceed it's performance yet.
- Marsymars 5mo ago> Lol. There is zero chance the low end mobile phone SoC shipped in those is remotely as fast as a six year old M1. Go look up some benchmarks, the Kompanio Ultra 910 is very comparable in speed to the Apple M1. It's not really a "low end mobile phone SoC" - it's a Chromebook-specific chip with Cortex-X925 and Cortex-X4 cores. Cortex-C1-based SoCs are faster but only available in phones to date, which gives them less thermal room. Anecdotally, I own both an M1 and a Kompanio Ultra 910 device, and they feel subjectively very similar from a performance standpoint.
- lern_too_spel 5mo agoYou're right. It's faster. It's an M2 class chip.
- whyagaindavid 5mo agoWhat the cost of these Kompanio Ultra 910 based chromebooks? like > $800?
- lern_too_spel 5mo ago$700 MSRP.