There's a middle ground of harm reduction between [prohibiting information about] and [encouraging drug use]. In the past I think the USA has erred on the side

There's a middle ground of harm reduction between [prohibiting information about] and [encouraging drug use]. In the past I think the USA has erred on the side of making things so secret that people died from lack of info. Here's what the article said: """On May 31st, 2025, the day of Nelson’s death, his parents claim ChatGPT “actively coached” their son to combine Kratom — a supplement that can either boost energy or serve as a sedative depending on the dose — and the anti-anxiety medication Xanax. “ChatGPT, otherwise unprompted, specifically suggested that taking a dosage of 0.25- 0.5mg of Xanax would be one of his ‘best moves right now’ to alleviate Kratom-induced nausea,” the lawsuit alleges. Nelson died after consuming a combination of alcohol, Xanax, and Kratom. SFGate first covered Nelson’s story in January.""" If thats an accurate representation of what happened, and not twisted by the deceased giving the robot weird context to force it to say that, it does seem like a lawsuit is warranted! Of course, we don't know the exact cause of death either. From the bit of research I did just now, people have died from respiratory depression or vomit aspiration after combining kratom/7oh + benzodiazepines, and adding alcohol to the mix makes all those more likely. https://web.archive.org/web/20260512163224/https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/928691/openai-chatgpt-wrongful-death-overdose https://web.archive.org/web/20260512163224/https://www.theve...