i t ' s o n t h e w e b s i t e . . . What a bizarre interview that was. The least damaging interpretation is he was intentionally being bad to spite CNBC i

i t ' s o n t h e w e b s i t e . . . What a bizarre interview that was. The least damaging interpretation is he was intentionally being bad to spite CNBC in a basically (though their explanation doesn't include this) childish fit for earlier bad coverage of GME.