3 ms·
I was on team dynamic for a long time and have moved to team static. For any long-lived code base, dynamic piles up invisible problems over time. It's great f
by tofuahdude 5mo ago
I was on team dynamic for a long time and have moved to team static.
For any long-lived code base, dynamic piles up invisible problems over time.
It's great for short-lived throwaway stuff, but as soon as you know you'll be maintaining a large code base for a long time, the "easier" part of dynamic actually becomes harder than just spelling stuff out.
It's obviously a trade-off and not everyone agrees, but that's my personal experience having run large eng teams for both types.
- slashdev 5mo agoThis is exactly my experience as well. If it were up to me, I'd start out by using the AI to port a Python web app to a compiled language like Go. Then we could maintain that going forward instead. In reality, a Python code base is maintained by Python programmers, most of whom would vote against such a change.