4 ms·
>Even the GPL depends on copyright enforcement I remember Stallman saying something along the lines that GPL is using copyright against itself. So I don't thi
by fierarul 14y ago
>Even the GPL depends on copyright enforcement
I remember Stallman saying something along the lines that GPL is using copyright against itself.
So I don't think GPL "depending" on copyright enforcement is a valid point for IP enforcement.
GPL is just specifically tailored for the current system and would just morph to something else if the legal climate changes.
- kd0amg 14y agoWithout copyright protection, it would be pretty easy to interfere with two of the Four Freedoms.
- thyrsus 14y agoWithout copyright protection, there would be less incentive to interfere with any of the freedoms. Imagining a lack of copyright on software, the two reasons I can think of to eschew sharing are to keep for oneself/one's group an advantage provided by the program (whether that be a better search algorithm or a better nuclear weapon simulator) or to prevent exposure of assumptions made by the software to a competitor/adversary (e.g., avoid illegitimate SEO, security through obscurity). The advantages of sharing would remain: everyone with more access, a larger number of people to help improve the software. The pro-copyright claim is that the current system provides incentives for more software to be built than the absence of copyright would; but that's an economic model without experimental validation and not even as reliable as tested economic models (e.g., Keynesian stimulation/damping).