3 ms·

No they're not the aggressors. Let's stop with the victim blaming.

raxxorraxor 5mo ago
Hezbollah is an Iranian supported schiite fundamentalist militant group effectively controlling the south of Lebanon. Syria declared war on Israel right after its founding and it rejected multiple peace offerings since. They are anything but victims.
- za3faran 5mo ago
  They are the victims. Hezbollah did not exist before the occupation. And Syria has the right to defend their neighbors against foreign invaders. https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/ https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/
  - raxxorraxor 5mo ago
    The "army of god" isn't in any way a victim, they are perpetrators of the highest order. The political goals of Hezbollah are only in-transparent to those that are blinded in their hatred of Israel for one reason or another.
    - za3faran 5mo ago
      Hezb does not mean army, it means party or group. Secondly, they only came to be after the invasion. It's normal to hate invaders who have committed countless crimes against humanity, not "for one reason or another": https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/ https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/
      - raxxorraxor 5mo ago
        Not true. It is a militant fundamentalist group. In contrast to Israel that often tries to avoid civilian targets, for Hezbollah terror is the goal. There is no excuse for that, they are what they themselves claim to be and no, they don't fight for anyone's freedom and are an extension of Iranian foreign policy. Israelis aren't invaders for that matter. Most were expelled from surrounding countries, Syria and Lebanon included. They have no claim or reason, just terror. Their security interest in Syria and Lebanon are fully justified.
        za3faran 5mo ago
        They are a resistance group that was formed after the occupation of Palestine. We've seen time and time again the israelis deliberately target and snipe civilians, it's very well documented and has been happening since the beginning of the invasion. Even the NYT recently published an article about how the israelies use dogs to rape Palestinians. The invader terror regime is exposed, no justification for their crimes or interest in so called (greater israel): https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed
        dlubarov 5mo ago
        > Even the NYT recently published an article about how the israelies use dogs to rape Palestinians. They published allegations from a questionable source with no evidence. I think most people would agree that "Israel trains dogs to rape on command" is rather absurd and implausible on its face.
        za3faran 5mo ago
        The evidence is there, but some people refuse to accept. The claim is not implausible, unfortunately - it happened in other countries (e.g. Chile). Either way, their history of war crimes and atrocities goes all the way back to the start of the invasion, and continues to this day for everyone to see: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9drj14e0lo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9drj14e0lo https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed
        dlubarov 5mo ago
        The first link is about a dog attack, but absolutely nothing about dogs being "trained to rape". The second link is nothing specific, just an entire subreddit devoted to anti-Israel propaganda. So where is this evidence that you say exists?
        za3faran 5mo ago
  - jameshilliard 5mo ago
    > Hezbollah did not exist before the occupation. Israel occupied parts of Lebanon due to attacks by PLO terrorists prior to Hezbollah being founded. Israel did not invade Lebanon prior to being attacked.

Hezbollah is an Iranian supported schiite fundamentalist militant group effectively controlling the south of Lebanon. Syria declared war on Israel right after its founding and it rejected multiple peace offerings since. They are anything but victims.

za3faran 5mo ago
They are the victims. Hezbollah did not exist before the occupation. And Syria has the right to defend their neighbors against foreign invaders. https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/ https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/
- raxxorraxor 5mo ago
  The "army of god" isn't in any way a victim, they are perpetrators of the highest order. The political goals of Hezbollah are only in-transparent to those that are blinded in their hatred of Israel for one reason or another.
  - za3faran 5mo ago
    Hezb does not mean army, it means party or group. Secondly, they only came to be after the invasion. It's normal to hate invaders who have committed countless crimes against humanity, not "for one reason or another": https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/ https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed/
    - raxxorraxor 5mo ago
      Not true. It is a militant fundamentalist group. In contrast to Israel that often tries to avoid civilian targets, for Hezbollah terror is the goal. There is no excuse for that, they are what they themselves claim to be and no, they don't fight for anyone's freedom and are an extension of Iranian foreign policy. Israelis aren't invaders for that matter. Most were expelled from surrounding countries, Syria and Lebanon included. They have no claim or reason, just terror. Their security interest in Syria and Lebanon are fully justified.
      - za3faran 5mo ago
        They are a resistance group that was formed after the occupation of Palestine. We've seen time and time again the israelis deliberately target and snipe civilians, it's very well documented and has been happening since the beginning of the invasion. Even the NYT recently published an article about how the israelies use dogs to rape Palestinians. The invader terror regime is exposed, no justification for their crimes or interest in so called (greater israel): https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed
        dlubarov 5mo ago
        > Even the NYT recently published an article about how the israelies use dogs to rape Palestinians. They published allegations from a questionable source with no evidence. I think most people would agree that "Israel trains dogs to rape on command" is rather absurd and implausible on its face.
        za3faran 5mo ago
        The evidence is there, but some people refuse to accept. The claim is not implausible, unfortunately - it happened in other countries (e.g. Chile). Either way, their history of war crimes and atrocities goes all the way back to the start of the invasion, and continues to this day for everyone to see: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9drj14e0lo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9drj14e0lo https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed https://www.reddit.com/r/israelexposed
        dlubarov 5mo ago
        The first link is about a dog attack, but absolutely nothing about dogs being "trained to rape". The second link is nothing specific, just an entire subreddit devoted to anti-Israel propaganda. So where is this evidence that you say exists?
        za3faran 5mo ago
- jameshilliard 5mo ago
  > Hezbollah did not exist before the occupation. Israel occupied parts of Lebanon due to attacks by PLO terrorists prior to Hezbollah being founded. Israel did not invade Lebanon prior to being attacked.