3 ms·
From the article: "This data is gonna be one for the history books. It's looking really good..."
by zacharypinter 14y ago
From the article:
"This data is gonna be one for the history books. It's looking really good..."
- arrrg 14y agoThe existence of any kind of life (past or present) would be something for the history books. Only Curiosity pretty much cannot find life, only hints that life exists or existed. Maybe this is about something else, but if this is only about hints that life exists or existed, then it isn’t really something for the history books. Most people would be bored by news like that. (I personally would find it very exciting, but I’m far from typical.)
- rymith 14y agore: Only Curiosity pretty much cannot find life What? A martian running in front of the camera would work. A rover not sent by earth. A little house on the... sand. Big ol skeleton of a unicorn... Seriously, you have no imagination.
- arrrg 14y agoIt cannot find any kind of life we can realistically expect to find (given past data). You hurt me. Don’t be so mean.
- fixedd 14y agoSPOILER WARNING There's life everywhere... we just haven't found it yet.
- andrewheins 14y agoI think we've all recognized the lack of context this actually provides. Something for a scientist's history books could mean jack to the general public.