3 ms·
There is not a lot of good literature, actually. I'm not saying anything even remotely factually controversial. Housing units per household: https://fred.stlou
by cyberax 6mo ago
There is not a lot of good literature, actually.
I'm not saying anything even remotely factually controversial. Housing units per household: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=15tRv https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=15tRv
It's also not controversial that major job density increases are happening in a few select metros: https://www.route-fifty.com/workforce/2019/06/job-density-report-brookings/157862/ https://www.route-fifty.com/workforce/2019/06/job-density-re... or if you look more broadly, that smaller cities in the US are dying out.
I simply arrived at a different conclusion: we don't need to continue deepening this death spiral by "building more".
- cman1444 6mo agoThat st louis fed link doesn't seem to show any clear trend to me. Looks like we're actually on a downturn after a peak. Regardless, I don't understand what your proposed solution to this supposed "jobs crisis" is.
- cyberax 6mo agoIt's a bit misleading because the Y axis is not starting at 0. > Regardless, I don't understand what your proposed solution to this supposed "jobs crisis" is. Tax the dense office space, or do cap&trade. Incentivize remote work. Treat commute time as work time. Prohibit dense housing except in special cases (university campuses, military bases, senior living, etc.). Promote and subsidize self-driving cars.