4 ms·

There are a lot of downsides to self-hosting your git as well. Especially if you need to deal with high availability, scalability beyond a single server, and/or

by thayne 5mo ago

There are a lot of downsides to self-hosting your git as well. Especially if you need to deal with high availability, scalability beyond a single server, and/or being open to the public Internet. I'm not saying you should never self-host your git server, but it's not for everyone.

com 5mo ago
These days even without trying I get more nine than GitHub. Arguments against self hosting have to change as our SaaS overlords are decaying in front of our very eyes.
phoronixrly 5mo ago
Good thing Github suck at availability and scalability much more than your friendly local sysadmin...
estimator7292 5mo ago
[dead]
shimman 5mo ago
No, these things are actually much easier to solve when you don't have to care for millions of users across every timezone and can just focus on <10,000 users that can easily be handled with a modest VPS setup. It's truly pathetic how developers today cede everything to cloud services. A $20 VPS (whatever gets you 4 gigs of ram) is likely enough to host all the business needs of 90% of SMBs across the US. Even easier today with things like Docker, Forgejo, and other great self hosting solutions. Why would a company care about opening up their codebase to the internet? These are problems you don't have to care about when you only want a small subset of solutions. Especially when the tradeoffs are drastically simpler.